This is a conversation between Ralph Allison and Charity, a Professor CIE.

FREEDOM

Charity: You were talking about the rules of your Book. Why is it the controlling mechanism of the rules? The controls of you humans. And then you were talking about freedom.

Ralph: You are aware that the United States is set up as the forefront country in the world in propagating the idea of individual freedom for all residents to use their potential and not submit to control by government. We have this going on all the time, and we go to other countries to blast the hell out of them and blockade them like Cuba because they won't give freedom to their residents. In China right now is the latest one where

C: Therefore what you humans are choosing to do is to choose to enforce your rules that you humans have made onto your continent area, to enforce that rule to other human beings in other parts of the globe. Why?

R: What I'm saying in this regard is what we are seeking for is that we want those other governments to give their citizens freedom, that's the big word, to use their own potentials as best they can.

C: But it is not FREEDOM. If we understand the term correctly, freedom means no choice. You other humans can do whatever you feel like to do, without hurting another human being. Is that not correct?

R: The freedom that I'm talking about is political freedom from being told by a government where you are going to live, how far you can travel, who you should marry, what job you're going to have, where you're going to live, and all those kind of personal kind of things that all of us are perfectly capable of choosing for ourselves.

C: Alright, you state that kind of freedom. That kind of freedom is fine if you humans choose to accept that kind of freedom. But what about the avenue about the freedoms that you are taking away from the human beings with the rules and the laws and more laws that you humans are passing. Answer that question. Michael, you answer.

Mike: Because they have politicians who want to control things, they have their own view and they say, "This is the way we're going to do it because I feel this is the way it should be done." They are creating rules, which, when you look at them, you say, "OK, we write this law and that is supposed to make social behavior, eliminate certain social behavior. This doesn't really make much sense because passing a law will not stop somebody from doing something.

C: Why would you want to pass something that can't correct a social behavior when your family has instilled what social behavior you need for that cultural which you are born into? That the Guardian has selected for you. Why?